Law and Society

HOME

For a book that I have written on "Counsellors as Witnesses" see Canada Law Book or

see "Clinicians in Court" at Guilford Press.

                                                    ------------------------------------

FACULTY OF GENERAL STUDIES         LWSO 512 L01

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY

FALL 1997                                                     Law and Society

Sept. 10 - Dec. 10, 1997                               Classroom: ST 64

Instructor: Allan Barsky,

 

Course Outline

This outline is for the first term of the course; another outline will be provided by Cheryl Shavrit for the second term. Each term is worth 50% towards final grades for the course.

COURSE SYLLABUS

Advanced level seminar for development of an interdisciplinary critical approach to law and its place in Canadian Society. Although the emphasis most years is on tort law, this year, the course will focus primarily on family law (first term) and environmental law (second term). The course will examine the ability of these specific fields of law to satisfy the needs of Canadian society.

RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER COURSES

This is the senior course in the Law and Society Programme. Students will be asked to bring into focus all they have learned about law in the context of liberal arts to examining particular fields of law. Course prerequisites include: Historical Studies 369; Law and Society: Sexual Equality and the Law 335; and Political Science 343.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES (Fall Term)

The course is designed so that — at the end of the term — students will be able to:

Identify and locate both primary and secondary sources of family law;

Understand the nature of the family law system, as it pertains specifically to issues arising upon separation or divorce (custody, access, spousal and child support, division of matrimonial property);

Apply legal reasoning to specific case examples;

Understand the roles of lawyers, judges, parties, witnesses and other people who are involved in the family law system;

Relate issues in Canadian family law to concerns at a societal level;

Critique the strengths and weaknesses of the ability of the family law system to meet the needs of Canadian families and society;

Offer suggestions for family law reform in order to improve upon the current system.

This course is not intended to be the equivalent of a law school course. Students who pass this course are not equipped to offer legal advice. In fact, anyone other than a licensed lawyer who provides legal advice may be liable for unauthorized practice of law.

INSTRUCTOR’S PERSPECTIVES

I have a background in law, social work and family mediation. Given this background, I believe that the legal system can offer support for the rights and freedoms of all individuals in society. However, the law can also have negative impacts on the rights and freedoms of particular individuals and groups. In order fully appreciate the strengths and problems of the family law system, I suggest that students begin by trying to understand the laws and legal arguments from conventional legal perspectives (through readings, discussions, observing lawyers and role playing). This will provide a basis from which to critique the legal system and apply alternative social analyses. I welcome diverse viewpoints in class discussions and written analyses.

REQUIRED READINGS

The following readings are available for purchase at the bookstore:

Package of Readings under Course Number LWSO 512 L01

Carswell (1998). Alberta Family Law Statutes. Toronto: Author. [we will focus primarily on the Divorce Act, Matrimonial Property Act, Domestic Relations Act, Child Welfare Act, and Dower Act]

Other course readings will be distributed in class, or made available on the Internet.

COURSE SCHEDULE AND WEEKLY READINGS

 

Date

Class Description

Readings

Class 1

Wednesday, Sept 10/97

Introductions, Course Overview, Choices and Contract, Pop Quiz (what do we already know?); "law review" - key concepts, Groups

Video - Taming the Blame Game

Vernon, 1996

[recommended but not required: Gall, 1990 - for an overview of Canadian legal system]

Class 2

Sept 17

Overview of Family Law System; Marriage; Reading a Statute; Briefing a Case

Skim through materials ahead of time; bring materials and statutes to class so that we can select ones to review together; Bring Wainright (1987) to class

Class 3

Sept 24

Divorce: Definitions; Framework; Legal Issues Societal Issues

Divorce Act; Irving and Benjamin, Ch. 2

Class 4

Oct 1

Custody and Access: Legal Standards; Applying Case and Statutory Law; Mobility Issues - Guest Speaker (I will be away due to Rosh Hashana, the Jewish New Year)

Divorce Act; Domestic Relations Act; Bala & Miklas, 1993; Davies 1997; Taylor v. Rossu

Class 5

Oct 8

Child and Spousal Support: Historical Development; Current Laws; Child Support Guidelines; Specific impacts on women and children

Federal Child Support Guidelines and Tables; Divorce Act; Domestic Relations Act; Farnell, 1997; Mitchell, 1997

Class 6

Oct 15

Division of Property - Upon Divorce; Upon separation between common law spouses; Forums for dispute resolution

Divorce Act; Matrimonial Property Act; Dower Act; Turnbull, 1997

Class 7

Oct 22

Mid-term Test

 

Class 8

Oct 29

Field Trip to Court - Specific time and place to meet to be decided

Class handouts

Class 9

Nov 5

Roles of Lawyers and Judges; Video

Preparations for Trial and Appeal

Students to present briefs on their roles

Cochrane Ch.4

(recommended: Moe, 1997); Materials handed out by students

Class 10

Nov 12

Family Law and Diversity Issues

Preparations for Trial and Appeal

Pawlizta & Hurtz, 1997

Class 11

Nov 19

Family Law Trial

Case studies

Class 12

Nov. 26

Family Law Appeal

Takehome Exam to be distributed

Case studies

Class 13

Dec 3

Last Class - Special Topic (as decided by Class); Review

 

Takehome test Due

Dec 10

4 p.m.

Please hand in to Social Work Front office; PFB-A - Third floor; Graded tests may be picked up after January 10 from same office.

 

(Statutory Holidays: Oct 13 is Thanksgiving, Nov 11 is Remembrance Day)

Final Examination date to be scheduled during examination period - Dec 11th to 20th.

STUDENT FEEDBACK: For each class, each student is responsible for answering the following two questions: (to be submitted to Allan at close of the class)

1. What is the major point you learned today?

2. What is the unanswered question you leave with today?

GRADING AND ASSIGNMENTS

The following components constitute the formal assessment of the degree to which the learner has achieved the learning objectives of this course:

Mid-term Test (October 22, 1997) -- 30%

Class Participation 20%

Final take-home test (Due Dec. 10, 1997) 50%

100%

Optional Assignment:
Students who wish to do an additional assignment in order to reduce the weight of any of the three required components by up to 50% may do an "Optional Paper" on a topic related to family law and society. Students wishing to do this optional paper must submit a written outline to Allan by October 1st. The outline should include the purpose of the paper, tentative topic headings, and at least 4 references related to the paper’s theme. Also, indicate which of the required components that this optional assignment will offset, and by how much (e.g., towards the final take-home, so that the take-home and optional assignment are each worth 25%). Finally, indicate the date upon which you will hand in the optional assignment (the last possible date for Optional Assignments is November 26, the second last class). Please feel free to discuss possible topics and formats with Allan.

MID-TERM TEST

This is a 2 1/2 hour open-book test, based on your readings and material covered during classes up to the date of the test. You may bring notes, books, or any other reference sources to class, except for a friend. You will not be expected to have memorized any case law or statutes, but rather have an understanding of the basic framework of family law and how it can be applied in particular cases. You will be presented with a case and with part of a statute. You will be asked to identify certain aspects of these materials (e.g., the key principle from a case; how the case was distinguished from other cases; obiter dictum,

PARTICIPATION

Students may demonstrate constructive participation in a variety of ways:

Physical attendance at classes;

Verbal involvement in class and group discussions;

Active participation in role plays or other group exercises;

Initiating discussion or bringing in information from assigned readings, other readings and/or experiences;

One-to-one dialogue with the instructor, outside of class;

Weekly feedback sheets;

Timely submission of assignments.

When considering the quantity and quality of participation, the following issues should be considered:

An appropriate level of participation from each student is related to the number of students in the class, the format of the class (e.g., lecture versus workshop), and the desirability of conciseness;

Respect for the rights of others in the class, including privacy and safety;

Good questions can include admitting one’s ignorance about a subject (if one person is feeling self-conscious about asking a question that may be seen as "stupid", there are probably several others in the class who want to know the same thing);

Students do not need to agree with statements made by the instructor. Students are encouraged to think for themselves, ask challenging questions (in a respectful manner), and arrive at their own understandings;

Questions/comments which are not relevant to the class or which are stated clearly in the materials can detract from the class and take up valuable time (My least favorite questions are "Is that single-spaced or double-spaced?" and "When is the assignment due?", when the answers are already set out in the materials).

If a student is away due to illness or other reason, it is that student’s responsibility to get notes, handout material, etc. from another student. The student may also suggest ways that they can make up for time lost (e.g., if you miss five classes, but you want to propose an extra assignment in lieu of participation).

If you have concerns about the class, or recommendations for it, please make these suggestions early so that they can be addressed/incorporated as early as possible.

Enthusiasm and humour can also contribute to the class.

FINAL TAKE-HOME

On November 19th, we will conduct a mock trial in class. On November 26th, we will conduct a mock appeals case. Both will be based on family law issues, with specific topics to be decided after consultation with the class. Each person will take on at least one role in either the trial or appeals case (e.g., lawyer, judge, witness). In order to prepare for these exercises, half of the class time on November 5th and 12th will be devoted to preparation. On November 5th, each person will present a five-minute brief to the class on what that person’s role entails, based on their own readings.

The final take home will be based on these exercises. Each student can choose whether to answer questions about the trial or about the appeals case. Answers should be typed, double-spaced and in a recognized format (e.g., APA). The questions will ask you to reflect on particular aspects of the cases, how they fit into the larger family law system, implications for society, and recommendations for law reform. The grade for the final take-home will not be based upon anyone’s performance in the role plays, but rather on their written take-home answers. This take-home may be submitted by students individually or by groups of up to four students. The same grading standards will apply regardless of whether a paper is submitted by an individual or a group.

GRADING

Grade Percentage

Grade Point Value Range Description

A 4.0 92-100% Excellent - superior performance, showing comprehensive understanding of subject matter.

A- 3.7 86-91%

B+ 3.3 81-85%

B 3.0 77-80% Good - clearly above-average performance with knowledge of subject matter generally complete.

B- 2.7 71-76%

C+ 2.3 65-70%

C 2.0 62-64% Satisfactory - basic understanding of subject matter.

C- 1.7 59-61%

D+ 1.3 55-58%

D 1.0 50-54% Minimal pass - marginal performance.

F 0 0-49% Fail - unsatisfactory performance or failure to meet course requirements.

OTHER REFERENCES and RESOURCES

Alberta Family and Social Services, Staff Development (1989). Court procedures training manual. Calgary, AB: Author.

Alberta Law & Reform Institute (various publication dates). Guides to law regarding various issues including divorce, getting married, and common law relationships.

Bala, N. (1990). Assessing the assessor: Legal issues. Canadian Family Law Quarterly, 6, 179-226.

Bala, N., & Miklas, S. (1993). Rethinking decisions about children: Is the best interests approach really in the best interests of children? Toronto: The Policy Research Centre on Children, Youth and Families [pp. 46-53; 7 pages of 302].

Barsky, A. E. (1997). Counsellors as witnesses. Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book.

Bertrand, L. D., & Hornick, J. (1994). Changing definitions of the family: A social science perspective. Invited paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Bar Association, Toronto, ON.

Black, H. C. (1991). Black’s law dictionary. New York: Law Book Exchange.

Calgary Legal Guidance (periodically updated). Dial-a-law service. Tel.: 800-332-1091 (including messages on divorce, matrimonial property, custody and access; Family Court).

Cameron, D. M. (1995). Preparing to be an expert witness. (Video plus workbook). Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book.

Cameron, D. M., & Burke, J. C. (1994). How to be an effective trial witness. (Video plus workbook). Aurora, ON: Canada Law Book.

Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family (housed in The University of Calgary Faculty of Law; includes reading room; call ahead with request to use: 220-6553).

Canadian Research Institute for Law and the Family (1994). Family life and legal remedies in Canada and England: Toward collaborative research. Prepared for Program for International Research Linkages, International Council for Canadian Studies, Ottawa, ON.

Cochrane, M. G. (1991). The everyday guide to Canadian family law. Scarborough, ON: Prentice-Hall.

Davies, C. (1997, April). Mobility rights: A review of the cases. Paper presented at Legal Education Society of Alberta, Banff, Alberta [26 pages].

Dickson, D. T. (1998). Confidentiality and privacy in social work. A guide to the law for practitioners and students. New York: Free Press. (ISBN: 0-684-82657-7. Ph.: 1-800-268-3215)

Dickson, D. T. (1995). Law in the health and human services. New York: Free Press.

Farnell, C. (1997, April). Spousal support for middle aged spouses. Paper presented at Legal Education Society of Alberta, Banff, Alberta [39 pages].

Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy – University of Calgary Web site. Available: http://www.ucalgary.ca/archives/FOIP.memo.html

Fradsham, A. A., & Lamoureux, H. (1995). Presenting expert witnesses. Toronto: Carswell.

Funder, K. Harrison, M., & Weston, R. (1993). Settling down: Pathways of parents after divorce. Australian Institute of

Gall, G. L. (1990). The Canadian legal system. Toronto: Carswell.

Gordon, M. (1997). The future of family law: The view from down in the trenches. Paper presented at Legal Education Society of Alberta, Banff, Alberta [31 pages].

Government of Canada (Justice). (1997). Federal Child Support Guidelines (and Tables for Alberta) Ottawa: Author[15 pages].

Irving, H., & Benjamin, M.. (1995). Family mediation: Contemporary issues. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Law Society of Alberta - WEB Site - http://www.ualberta.ca.lawsociety.profession.html
(includes links to Information for the Legal Profession, Code of Professional Conduct; Canadian Bar Association; Alberta Law Reform Institute; Legal Education Society of Alberta).

Legal Education Society of Alberta; 800-282-3900 (Publications and Seminars).

Mitchell, A. (1997, April 10). Women made poorer by alimony. The Globe and Mail [1 page].

Moe, D. (1997, April). Minimizing conflict in parenting disputes. Paper presented at Legal Education Society of Alberta, Banff, Alberta [26 pages].

Pawlitza, L., & Hurst, A. (1996). All in the family: The law, the courts and same sex parents. Paper presented at Federation of Law Societies’ National Family Law Program (40 pages).

Saltzman, A., & Furman, D. M. (1999). Law in social work practice (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Satterfield, M., & Vayda, E. (1989; new edition pending). Law for social workers: A Canadian guide. Toronto: Carswell.

Swenson, S. C. (1993). Psychology and law for the helping professions. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.

Turnbull, J. A. (1997, April). Judicial expansion of the term "spouse." Paper presented at Family Law Banff Refresher Course, Banff, Alberta [14 pages].

University of Calgary Law Library

Vernon, M. (1996). Bluff your way in law. West Sussex, UK: Ravette.

Wallerstein, J. S. (1997, June). 30 Year Follow up on Children of Divorce. Presented at Second World Congress on Family Law and the Rights of Children and Youth, San Francisco, CA.

Wallace, H. (1998). Victimology: Legal, psychological and social perspectives. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Yogis, J. A. (1990). Canadian law dictionary (2nd Ed.). Toronto: Carswell.

SAFEWALK - 220-5333

Campus security will escort individuals, day or night. Call 220-5333. Use any campus phone, emergency phone or the yellow phone located at most parking lot pay booths.

THE UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY

Faculty of General Studies

Law and Society

Course LWSO 512 - 1997 Fall Session

Student Information Sheet

Please complete this form and hand it in to the instructor during the first class.

 

Instructor: Allan Barsky

Student’s Name: ______________________________________________________

Phone: (Day) ______________________ (Eve) __________________________

Current work setting/placement (if any): __________________________________

Future work setting/placement (if known): __________________________________

Education: U.Calgary - Major ____ Year _____

Prior education/involvement with law/family law issues:

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

____________________________________________________________________________

Student expectations for course or other comments ____________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________________________________

Evaluation (to be filled in by the Instructor):

Mid-term Test: ____________/30%

Participation : ____________/20%

Final take-home test ____________/50%

Optional ____________

Final Grade ____________/100% Letter grade ____